Thursday, 2 February 2017



None of the Above!

In the 1985 Hollywood comedy movie Brewster's Millions, the protagonist Brewster (played by the inimitable Richard Pryor) is required to spend under strict conditions 30 million dollars in 30 days, so he can inherit an even greater fortune. In order to spend as much money as possible within the time frame he enters the race for Mayor of New York City and throws most of his money at a protest campaign urging a vote for “None of the Above”. Brewster ends his campaign when he learns, much to his surprise, that he is ahead of the two corrupt establishment candidates in the poll and announces that if he wins the mayoralty he intends to decline the post. In the end neither of the two mainstream candidates wins the election, and a new election with different candidates has to be held. With the grotesque carnival of lying and religious bigotry that is the Northern Ireland Assembly elections now in full swing I  think it would be a splendid idea to have a box, on the bottom of each ballot paper, in which people can put a cross against 'None of the Above'.

If enough people did this the election would have to be run again.  There would be absolutely nothing to worry about with regards to the alleged “political vacuum “this would create. Everyone knows it is civil servants than run these six counties anyway not the politicians, some of whom are adept only in the ability to run up exorbitant expenses claims at the largesse of the tax payer. The fabric of society didn’t crumble in Belgium when there was no government in charge for 589 days[1] so I am sure we would be fine without the sectarian power sharing arrangement that is currently the Northern Ireland Assembly for an extended period of time.

If elections in Northern Ireland had to be re-run ad infinitum the DUP, Sinn Féin and all the other big parties would eventually run out of money and we would have heard their electoral promises so many times that we could see them as the lies that they are right from the get go.

It could act as a political catalyst for the silent majority of decent people from both communities in the North of Ireland. New parties could be formed that actually spoke for the real needs of the people of the six counties. They could fight to drain the swamp that is Northern Irish politics of all the divisive sectarian organisations that govern us aided and abetted with the implicit threat of paramilitary groups and donations from dodgy, wealthy property developers. Any promise of a better, shared future that the power sharing government which emerged as a result of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement is now gone. Bulmer Hobson the veteran, Belfast born Irish republican said when asked why he was not attending the fortieth anniversary celebrations of the Easter Rising in Dublin “the phoenix of our youth has fluttered to earth a miserable old hen. I have no heart for it.”[2]  I share similar sentiments about the outcome of the Northern Ireland Peace Process.

Of course all of the above is just a pipe dream on my part. This being Northern Ireland the political organisations would probably seek a similar  resolution  to the one suggested in German writer Bertolt Brecht’s satirical  poem “The Solution” 

After the uprising of the 17th June
The Secretary of the Writers Union
Had leaflets distributed in the Stalinallee
Stating that the people
Had forfeited the confidence of the government
And could win it back only
By redoubled efforts. Would it not be easier
In that case for the government
To dissolve the people
And elect another?

Nonetheless I won’t be casting my vote in these upcoming elections. I would rather stick a knitting needle into my eye.  When I say this to some of my friends they are absolutely horrified and react as if I have advocated cannibalism or some other transgressive act. They remind me how people fought and died for the right to vote and other conventional wisdom on the subject.  I respond to this by saying that there is no moral obligation to vote in such a contest as the Northern Ireland Assembly elections where all the parties are standing on platforms antithetical to humanist values. In fact there is a greater moral imperative not to vote as a large scale refusal to vote would rob the corrupt, sectarian institution that is the Northern Ireland Assembly of much of the legitimacy it currently has and most certainly doesn’t deserve.





 

Wednesday, 1 February 2017


The Unknown Known of Trump’s Muslim Ban

What the Trump administration is doing with last week’s ban on immigration from seven Muslim countries is engineering a "shock event." They want to create chaos. As the population becomes polarized in reaction to this event, those responsible for the event will come to the fore with the solution claiming that they alone know how to restore order.  When the US Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld made his famous “ There are known knowns” comments in 2002 regarding the presence of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq[1], the Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Žižek, in a typically Lacanian twist added a fourth category that of “unknown knowns”[2]. Žižek’s unknown knowns are things we don't know we know a concept similar to the Freudian psychoanalytic idea of the subconscious.  The Trump administration state the travel ban is a temporary contingent action aimed at ensuring the safety of US citizens during these uncertain times. However I can’t help but wonder if Trump and his chief strategist and National Security Council member Steve Bannon's real reasons for the so called “Muslim ban” fall into the category of an unknown known.

The French economist Thomas Piketty in his acclaimed magnum opus Capital in the Twenty First Century[3] argues that wealth inequality in western society is on the rise again after falling for the first time in recorded history during the 20th century. The period of working class and middle class prosperity of the last century was due to the playing field being levelled as a result of the economic conditions created as a result of the Great Depression and two world wars. Destruction of tangible assets such as property during the war, high taxes, inflation, bankruptcies and the growth of state welfare caused wealth to shrink dramatically, ushering in an unprecedented era of egalitarian wealth and income distribution and the expansion of the middle class. However now the shocks of the last century have now faded wealth is now reasserting itself and inequality is now returning to levels last seen over a century ago. Interestingly Bannon in a 2014 speech at the Vatican[4] also drew attention to the rising wealth inequality in western society and the dangers it presents. However an ultra- conservative, ex Goldman Sachs banker like Bannon isn't going to see Piketty's idea of a progressive wealth tax as the solution to the problem of inequality.

I can’t help but think that maybe the known unknown with regards to Trump administration’s policies is that they secretly believe that starting an all-out war – both at home and abroad -  will be the stimulus the US economy needs in order to “make America great again”.  The enemy in this war will be the Islamic world, which Bannon in the aforementioned speech, went to great lengths to present as the preeminent threat to western Judeo-Christian society.  The travel ban is a shock event calculated to get people ready both culturally and militarily for the proverbial “Clash of Civilizations” war with so called “Radical Islam”.  This is ideology at its most dangerous and divisive.